Vocabulary
A. Enhance (verb) [French:
améliorer, renforcer]: To improve something or make it more effective.
Example: Good lighting can enhance the appearance of a room.
B. Counterproductive (adjective) [French:
contre-productif]: Having an effect opposite to what was intended.
Example: Skipping meals can be counterproductive when trying to lose weight.
C. Distracting (adjective) [French:
distrayant, perturbant]: Making it difficult to give your full
attention. Example: The loud music was distracting while I was studying.
D. Sustained
concentration (noun phrase) [French: concentration soutenue]: The
ability to focus for a long time. Example: Writing a long essay requires
sustained concentration.
E. Weaken (verb) [French:
affaiblir]: To make something less strong or effective. Example:
Lack of sleep can weaken your ability to concentrate.
F. Distinct (adjective) [French: distinct, séparé]: Clearly different or separate from something else. Example: The twins have very distinct personalities.
G. Alongside (preposition) [French: à côté de, parallèlement à]: Next to or together with something. Example: She worked alongside her father for many years.
H. Explicit (adjective) [French: explicite, clair]: Clearly stated and easy to understand. Example: The instructions were explicit and easy to follow.
I. Workstations (noun, plural) [French: postes de travail]: Desks or areas where people do their work. Example: The office has twenty workstations for employees.
J. Dispersed colleagues (noun phrase) [French: collègues répartis à différents endroits]: Colleagues who work in different locations. Example: Video calls help dispersed colleagues communicate effectively.
K. Allocate (verb) [French: attribuer, affecter, répartir]: To give something to someone for a particular purpose. Example: The manager will allocate more money to employee training.
L. Lockers (noun, plural) [French: casiers]: Small storage spaces that can be locked. Example: Students leave their bags in lockers during class.
M. Fully equipped (adjective phrase) [French: entièrement équipé]: Containing everything needed for a particular purpose. Example: The kitchen is fully equipped with modern appliances.
N. Logistical disruption (noun phrase) [French: perturbation logistique]: A problem that affects the organization or movement of things. Example: The strike caused serious logistical disruption at the airport.
O. In-office team days (noun phrase) [French: journées d’équipe au bureau]: Days when team members are expected to work together at the office. Example: Our in-office team days are usually on Tuesdays.
P. Ultimately (adverb) [French: en fin de compte, finalement]: Finally, after considering everything. Example: Ultimately, we have to accept the decision.
Q. Left to chance (expression) [French: laissé au hasard]: Not planned or controlled, but allowed to happen randomly. Example: Important decisions should not be left to chance.
Guide Questions
1. What are the disadvantages of open-space offices?
2. What are the solutions?
3. What are the disadvantages of flex-desk systems?
4. What are the solutions?
TRANSCRIPT
Discussion
1. Which type of office do you prefer: an open-plan office, a flex-desk office, a private office, or a cubicle? Why? (Quel type de bureau préférez-vous : un open space, un bureau en flex desk, un bureau individuel ou un bureau avec cloisons ? Pourquoi ?)
2. Which type of office is better for productivity? Why? (Quel type de bureau est le meilleur pour la productivité ? Pourquoi ?)
3. Do you think employees should be able to choose where they work in the office? Why or why not? (Pensez-vous que les employés devraient pouvoir choisir où ils travaillent dans le bureau ? Pourquoi ou pourquoi pas ?)
4. What would your ideal office look like? Why? (À quoi ressemblerait votre bureau idéal ? Pourquoi ?)
5. Would you accept a lower salary if your employer offered you a much better office? Why or why not? (Accepteriez-vous un salaire plus bas si votre employeur vous proposait un meilleur environnement de travail ? Pourquoi ou pourquoi pas ?)
6. Should companies design their offices based on employees’ needs or the company’s needs? Explain. (Les entreprises devraient-elles aménager leurs bureaux en fonction des besoins des employés ou de ceux de l’entreprise ? Expliquer.)
7. Can putting employees from different departments together cause more problems than benefits? Explain. (Le fait de faire travailler ensemble des employés de différents services peut-il créer plus de problèmes que d’avantages ? Expliquer.)
8. Should senior managers have the same type of workspace as other employees? Why or why not? (Les cadres supérieurs devraient-ils avoir le même type d’espace de travail que les autres employés ? Pourquoi ou pourquoi pas ?)
9. Can having fewer desks encourage too many employees to work from home and weaken team spirit? Explain. (Le fait d’avoir moins de bureaux peut-il encourager trop d’employés à travailler à distance et affaiblir l’esprit d’équipe ? Expliquer.)
10. Which is more important: talking easily with colleagues or having quiet time to work? Can you have both? (Qu’est-ce qui est le plus important : pouvoir parler facilement avec ses collègues ou avoir du calme pour travailler ? Peut-on avoir les deux ?)
11. Should employees work next to different colleagues, or should they choose who they sit next to? Explain. (Les employés devraient-ils travailler à côté de collègues différents ou choisir avec qui ils s’assoient ? Expliquer.)
12. Can the office layout affect which employees managers notice and their career opportunities? Explain. (L’aménagement du bureau peut-il influencer les employés que les managers remarquent et leurs possibilités de carrière ? Expliquer.)
13. In ten years, do you think permanent desks will be less common, or will employees want them again? Why? (Dans dix ans, pensez-vous que les bureaux attitrés seront moins courants ou que les employés voudront les retrouver ? Pourquoi ?)

.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment
DISCLAIMER: The other contributing writers and members of this publication and our advertisers do not necessarily share the opinions of the writer of the article above.