RATIONALE FOR THE USE OF NON-FREE MEDIA. CLICK THIS |
“Art is a
guarantee of sanity. That is the most important thing I have said.”
Louise
Bourgeois
“She’s
insane,” as many moviegoers may assume.
Within the confines of dark theaters all over the world, some of us may
take the easiest explanation and simply place Nina, the Swan Queen, in the
loony basket along with her putrid eggs and frayed white and black feathers
soiled with blood. Nevertheless, if you
dare to see Nina in the eyes of an obsessive perfectionist artist, Nina is
nothing but insane. She is, in fact, the most rational of all the ballet
dancers in the “Black Swan” ensemble because she knows exactly what must be
done to get everything “perfect.” Put
yourself in her shoes, figuratively speaking, and you might comprehend her
motivation. One must understand that a true
artist is brazen and has no sense of self-preservation for the sake of his or
her craft. Most artists, especially
performance artist like actors and dancers, rely on superficial camouflage to highlight
their transformation into their characters. Sometimes, the deceit works and we
see more of the mask rather than the real transformation. I am sure you have watched countless actors
who thought that by merely looking like the characters, their job is done.
On the other hand, some great thespians do intensive character research and internalization that they simply alter their stance, incorporate gestures and a slight change in voice and they become the character. They cease to be the actor. Why is this so? It is because the transformation had already taken place deep within the actor, and so everything external is simply a physical manifestation. Think Meryl Streep in “Sophie’s Choice,” Holly Hunter in “The Piano,” Nora Aunor in “Himala,” Heath Ledger in “Brokeback Mountain,” Gong Li in “The Story of Qiu Ju,” Daniel Day Lewis in “My Left Foot,” and Anthony Hopkins and Jodie Foster in “Silence of the Lambs.”
On the other hand, some great thespians do intensive character research and internalization that they simply alter their stance, incorporate gestures and a slight change in voice and they become the character. They cease to be the actor. Why is this so? It is because the transformation had already taken place deep within the actor, and so everything external is simply a physical manifestation. Think Meryl Streep in “Sophie’s Choice,” Holly Hunter in “The Piano,” Nora Aunor in “Himala,” Heath Ledger in “Brokeback Mountain,” Gong Li in “The Story of Qiu Ju,” Daniel Day Lewis in “My Left Foot,” and Anthony Hopkins and Jodie Foster in “Silence of the Lambs.”
RATIONALE FOR THE USE OF NON-FREE MEDIA. CLICK THIS |
In “Black
Swan,” we are not watching Nina undergoing her difficulties getting into
character. We are actually inside Nina’s
mind, definitely not in the entire movie of course. The deceit of “Black Swan”
is its absurdity. The key is to know the exact moment when we went deep inside
Nina’s mind. When did we move from outside to inside? When did we occupy the
seats in Nina’s mind, right in the center of her internal struggle to play both
the White Swan and the Black Swan? Did
you notice when? All these will explain the supernatural or surreal experiences
that we witness afterwards. As Nina grew closer in fully internalizing the
character of the Black Swan, we get to see her darker side, the amoral fowl,
and the tools that she boldly uses to conjure her darker sweet bird of
youth. We witness Nina split into two.
Once we get in her head, we also see things differently. For all we know, everybody in the ballet
company is as dry and boring as a day old shoe mold. All the excitement and terror that we see are
all from Nina’s internal processes as a dancer.
Contrast
that to Lily (played by Mila Kunis) who is more of the physical
dancer/actress. She develops her
character based on external tools. In
fact, you might even say Lily’s portrayal of the Black Swan is not a stretch at
all. She is already a black swan in real life. She is impulsive, bitchy and her
tattoo on her back is a mark of a mediocre female performer. Nina, on the other hand, is not. She is the
white swan and so she must ransack her innermost psyche to pull her black swan
out. In this process, she must use all
her tools. She must entertain her anger
and resentment towards her mother. She
must allow herself to explore sexual adventurism, real and imagined, to
understand the motivation of the black swan. The closer she becomes the black
swan, the scarier the scenes become.
When she finally becomes the tempestuous fowl, she not only feels it,
she actually believes it. Remember that
very powerful scene when black feathers were piercing out from her skin; she
does not rejects the black swan anymore. She succumbs to her will. Only we can
see her internal transformation. The ballet audience just sees Nina dancing.
When her dance ends, the audience just sees Nina. We, however, see her
transform to the sultry sinister swan.
In the climax, the apex of Nina's portrayal, to reach her goal of
performance perfection, Nina executed her final sacrifice in the name of art.
The white swan must be defeated and die bleeding. Nina is the quintessential perfectionist
method performer, one perfect performance is better than countless mediocrity.
The following are reviews about the film
- “Where is Your Mother, Nina?” The Nonexistent Mother
- Dark Perfection: “The Internal Process of the Performer”
- Movie about Mother-Daughter Abuse by Faith Allen
No comments:
Post a Comment
DISCLAIMER: The other contributing writers and members of this publication and our advertisers do not necessarily share the opinions of the writer of the article above.